Contemporary management no longer operates within a stable environment whose trajectories can be easily predicted. Instead, organizations face rapid transformations driven by technological evolution, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, shifting beneficiary needs, and escalating levels of complexity and uncertainty. Amidst these changes, upgrading traditional management tools is no longer sufficient for addressing the future. Consequently, a deeper level of managerial thinking has emerged—one that views management itself as a system requiring continuous review, redesign, and development. Herein lies the significance of Meta-Management as an intellectual orientation that transcends the mere practice of management to reflect on how management is constructed and evolved. Meta-Management is built upon a fundamental premise: management should not merely manage resources, operations, and personnel; rather, it must possess the capability to manage the very way management is conducted. While a traditional manager is preoccupied with the question, "How do we achieve objectives efficiently?", Meta-Management shifts to a deeper inquiry: "Is the approach we employ in setting goals, making decisions, allocating resources, and managing people still appropriate for the environment in which we operate?" Through this, management becomes continuously capable of reviewing its assumptions, tools, and methodologies. From a strategic perspective, Meta-Management represents a transition from focusing on managing the present to reshaping the administrative system in alignment with the Al-Mustaqbal. It does not view strategy as a static plan, but rather as a continuous capacity to rethink the directions, choices, and mechanisms adopted by the organization. Therefore, Meta-Management contributes to building more agile organizations capable of responding to transformations by embedding the review of the management model as an intrinsic part of strategic work. This concept gains even greater importance in the era of artificial intelligence and digital transformation. The challenge is no longer restricted to utilizing technology to improve operations; rather, it concerns how to redesign management itself in light of the capabilities provided by technology. Artificial intelligence, data analytics, automation, and digital platforms can alter the nature of decision-making, role distribution, performance measurement methods, and internal communication within organizations. Here, Meta-Management emerges as a framework that helps the organization question not only how to use new tools, but how to transform the managerial model that utilizes those tools. Furthermore, Meta-Management is closely linked to organizational learning. Al-Mustaqbal organizations cannot rely solely on past experiences, as future conditions may differ radically from those of the past. Therefore, management needs to build mechanisms that allow it to learn from experiences, discover vulnerabilities, reconsider decisions and policies, and transform accumulated knowledge into strategic capability. In this sense, Meta-Management becomes an ongoing process of re-evaluating the administrative system rather than just an additional administrative technique. The strategic value of Meta-Management lies in expanding the concept of management from administering resources and operations to managing the capability to manage itself. An organization capable of altering its administrative tools when the environment changes is far better prepared to face transformations than one clinging to a single managerial model regardless of shifting circumstances. Hence, Meta-Management can be viewed as an approach that helps organizations transition from merely responding to transformations to preparing for them and forging new pathways for development. Meta-Management does not serve as a substitute for strategic management; rather, it acts as a deeper level that supports it. Strategic management focuses on defining directions, goals, and major choices, whereas Meta-Management helps review the ecosystem that generates those directions, decisions, and choices. Combining the two opens the door to a more flexible administrative model capable of learning, adaptation, and foresight. Ultimately, Meta-Management expresses a paradigm shift in how we think about management itself. The core question is no longer just how to run the organization better, but how to build an administrative system capable of continuously developing itself. This transformation establishes Meta-Management as a strategic concept tied to the Al-Mustaqbal of organizations and their ability to cope with complexity and change, elevating administrative thought from managing current realities to reshaping the tools and systems that build the Al-Mustaqbal .